← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jimmy O'Kane Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 42 20 43 63 1.500 0.1117 0.1105 0.3435 0.3399
2018-19 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 38 8 13 21 0.553 0.0623 0.0615 0.1876 0.1853
2019-20 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 40 20 28 48 1.200 0.1354 0.1354 0.4074 0.4074
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Wilkes D3 MAC SR 27 10 18 28 1.037
2022-23 Wilkes D3 MAC JR 26 6 14 20 0.769
2021-22 Wilkes D3 MAC SO 21 6 10 16 0.762
2020-21 Wilkes D1 FR 8 1 0 1 0.125
2020-21 Wilkes D3 MAC FR 8 1 0 1 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2020-21 · Wilkes
+80.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
52%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16227
Forward overall
#764
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Potsdam · 2008-09
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2017-18
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2018-19
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.