IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Carr Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-07-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 31 3 5 8 0.258 0.0866 0.0939 0.2388 0.2589
2007-08 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 60 11 16 27 0.450 0.1509 0.1552 0.4164 0.4284
2008-09 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 61 16 18 34 0.557 0.1870 0.1846 0.5158 0.5092
2009-10 St. Albert Steel AJHL 57 21 26 47 0.825 0.2766 0.2589 0.7631 0.7143
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 18 3 3 6 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2010-11 · SUNY Potsdam
+69.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25942
Forward overall
#873
Forward born in 1989
#737
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mac Olson
Hobart · 2011-12
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor MacDonell
Stevenson · 2021-22
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Phil Cherneski
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2000-01
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.