← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Rumsey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 WB/Scranton Knights EHL 46 4 9 13 0.283 0.0413 0.0437 0.1386 0.1467
2018-19 WB/Scranton Knights EHL 44 11 17 28 0.636 0.0931 0.0938 0.3120 0.3145
2019-20 Boston Dukes EHL 42 13 27 40 0.952 0.1393 0.1393 0.4670 0.4670
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Rivier D3 MASCAC 21 5 4 9 0.429
2023-24 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SR 28 6 17 23 0.821
2022-23 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 JR 32 8 17 25 0.781
2021-22 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SO 23 10 14 24 1.044
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D1 FR 6 0 1 1 0.167
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 FR 6 0 1 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2020-21 · Franklin Pierce
+164.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
48%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21622
Forward overall
#1059
Forward born in 1999
#508
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2006-07
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2018-19
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2005-06
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.