IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Foy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-06-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 41 5 3 8 0.195 0.0478 0.0483 0.1335 0.1349
2006-07 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 41 8 9 17 0.415 0.1016 0.0976 0.2838 0.2725
2007-08 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 22 1 7 8 0.364 0.0891 0.0815 0.2489 0.2278
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 SUNY Potsdam D3 — SR 25 6 7 13 0.520
2010-11 SUNY Potsdam D3 — JR 21 1 2 3 0.143
2009-10 SUNY Potsdam D3 — SO 22 2 2 4 0.182
2008-09 SUNY Potsdam D3 — FR 8 0 6 6 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2008-09 · SUNY Potsdam
+896.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#46007
Forward overall
#1490
Forward born in 1987
#3311
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tommy Kundinger
Beloit · 2024-25
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeremy Mitchell
St. Norbert · 2001-02
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Thompson
Lake Forest · 2004-05
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.