IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Kundinger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-06-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 West Bend Power NA3HL 34 0 10 10 0.294 0.0369 0.0400 0.0928 0.1006
2022-23 West Bend Power NA3HL 42 6 9 15 0.357 0.0448 0.0465 0.1127 0.1171
2023-24 West Bend Power NA3HL 36 5 10 15 0.417 0.0523 0.0518 0.1316 0.1304
2024-25 West Bend Power NA3HL 38 10 16 26 0.684 0.0859 0.0806 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Beloit D3 WIAC FR 6 2 0 2 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2025-26 · Beloit
+411.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14143
Defenseman overall
#2806
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Morgan Shepherd
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2004-05
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Mark
St. Norbert · 2017-18
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Gaffney
Johnson & Wales · 2022-23
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.