IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Mark Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-06-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Grand Rapids High USHS-MN 25 4 10 14 0.560 0.0709 0.0719 0.1360 0.1379
2016-17 Estevan Bruins SJHL 39 1 6 7 0.179 0.0460 0.0479 0.1353 0.1409
2017-18 — SJHL 44 3 13 16 0.364 0.0932 0.0927 0.2741 0.2727
2018-19 Yorkton Terriers SJHL 58 11 40 51 0.879 0.2253 0.2126 0.6628 0.6253
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 24 3 6 9 0.375
2021-22 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 29 6 9 15 0.517
2020-21 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 St. Norbert D1 NCHA FR 25 2 7 9 0.360
2019-20 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 25 2 7 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2019-20 · St. Norbert
+131.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9032
Defenseman overall
#1674
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neal Sheehan
Fredonia · 2003-04
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Isherwood
Curry · 2024-25
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
John Krapian
Post · 2017-18
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.