| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Grand Rapids High | USHS-MN | 25 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 0.560 | 0.1508 | 0.1529 | 0.1360 | 0.1379 |
| 2016-17 | Estevan Bruins | SJHL | 39 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0.179 | 0.0519 | 0.0540 | 0.1351 | 0.1407 |
| 2017-18 | — | SJHL | 44 | 3 | 13 | 16 | 0.364 | 0.1050 | 0.1045 | 0.2737 | 0.2724 |
| 2018-19 | Yorkton Terriers | SJHL | 58 | 11 | 40 | 51 | 0.879 | 0.2540 | 0.2396 | 0.6619 | 0.6245 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | St. Norbert | D3 | NCHA | SR | 24 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.375 |
| 2021-22 | St. Norbert | D3 | NCHA | JR | 29 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 0.517 |
| 2020-21 | St. Norbert | D3 | NCHA | SO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2019-20 | St. Norbert | D3 | NCHA | FR | 25 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.360 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.