IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Bourne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-06-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 57 13 14 27 0.474 0.1589 0.1644 0.4384 0.4535
2010-11 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 57 28 32 60 1.053 0.3530 0.3466 0.9741 0.9566
2011-12 Coquitlam Express BCHL 40 10 14 24 0.600 0.2312 0.2143 0.8732 0.8092
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SR 25 13 11 24 0.960
2014-15 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 25 6 8 14 0.560
2013-14 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 12 1 2 3 0.250
2012-13 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 26 5 5 10 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2012-13 · Fredonia
+68.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16956
Forward overall
#639
Forward born in 1991

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steve Schroeder
Norwich · 2008-09
0.742 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jhuwon Davis
New England College · 2018-19
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Albano
UMass Boston · 2016-17
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.