IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Tobin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Tabor NE-Prep 28 13 14 27 0.964 0.1939 0.1939 0.4410 0.4410
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Williams D3 NESCAC SR 17 4 5 9 0.529
2022-23 Williams D3 NESCAC JR 19 2 4 6 0.316
2021-22 Williams D3 NESCAC SO 22 2 1 3 0.136
2020-21 Williams D3 NESCAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
85%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18746
Forward overall
#889
Forward born in 2001
#132
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Sawicky
Bethel · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
David McNab
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Brandt
Tufts · 2016-17
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.