IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Amante Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-02-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 — EHL 15 7 11 18 1.200 0.4223 0.4180 0.5884 0.5825
2019-20 New England Wolves EHL 44 15 27 42 0.955 0.3359 0.3359 0.4680 0.4680
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SR 27 12 13 25 0.926
2022-23 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 JR 27 8 10 18 0.667
2021-22 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SO 22 8 13 21 0.955
2020-21 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
20%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10316
Forward overall
#460
Forward born in 1999
#116
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Chad McDonald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jared Linnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tim Murphy
UMass Boston · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Rick Varone
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Luiten
Neumann · 2011-12
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.