IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tim Murphy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHL 7 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 38 9 13 22 0.579 0.1242 0.1226 0.2835 0.2799
2015-16 Philadelphia Flyers Elite USPHL-Premier-Classic 39 8 13 21 0.538 0.1617 0.1532 0.4436 0.4204
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast FR 1 0 1 1 1.000
2001-02 Army D1 — SR 32 5 13 18 0.562
2001-02 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — SR 25 4 18 22 0.880

NCAAe Rankings

#28304
Forward overall
#1161
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason McAloon
Lake Forest · 2010-11
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Sposit
Nichols · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Brown
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.