IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Lindsay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 — EHL 40 16 11 27 0.675 0.0988 0.0996 0.3310 0.3338
2019-20 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 46 8 19 27 0.587 0.0859 0.0859 0.2878 0.2878
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SR 26 5 6 11 0.423
2022-23 Framingham State D3 MASCAC JR 24 5 2 7 0.292
2021-22 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SO 18 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Framingham State D3 MASCAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25267
Forward overall
#1283
Forward born in 1999
#683
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Pat Deitz
Concordia · 2007-08
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Anderson
Wesleyan · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Garrett Hendrickson
Concordia · 2011-12
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.