IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Rochester Jr. Americans USPHL-Elite 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Renfrew Wolves CCHL 26 3 2 5 0.192 0.0417 0.0409 0.1489 0.1459
2019-20 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 44 15 21 36 0.818 0.1197 0.1197 0.4012 0.4012
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SR 16 2 1 3 0.188
2022-23 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC JR 22 5 4 9 0.409
2021-22 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SO 19 2 5 7 0.368
2020-21 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28952
Forward overall
#1519
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Roman Uchyn
St. Norbert · 2013-14
0.690 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Boutoussov
Salve Regina · 2015-16
0.724 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Casey Esselman
Concordia (WI) · 2015-16
0.208 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.