← New Search ↗ Social Card

Roman Uchyn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-07-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 35 4 8 12 0.343 0.2108 0.2121 1.0103 1.0164
2013-14 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 19 1 3 4 0.210 0.1294 0.1241 0.6202 0.5950
2014-15 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 47 12 17 29 0.617 0.2445 0.2304 0.6478 0.6103
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 St. Norbert D1 SR 31 15 18 33 1.065
2018-19 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 31 15 18 33 1.065
2017-18 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 30 9 9 18 0.600
2016-17 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 28 11 9 20 0.714
2015-16 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 29 13 7 20 0.690
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2015-16 · St. Norbert
+328.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22684
Forward overall
#882
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2003-04
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
0.900 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2013-14
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.