IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aaron Jones Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-07-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Syracuse Jr. Stars USPHL-Elite 39 5 4 9 0.231 0.0213 0.0223 0.0529 0.0553
2016-17 Syracuse Jr. Stars USPHL-Elite 11 2 2 4 0.364 0.0336 0.0332 0.0833 0.0823
2017-18 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier 44 7 20 27 0.614 0.0803 0.0755 0.2083 0.1959
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Amherst D3 NESCAC — 2 0 1 1 0.500
2021-22 Amherst D3 NESCAC — 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Amherst D1 NESCAC SO 8 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Amherst D3 NESCAC — 8 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Amherst D1 NESCAC FR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Amherst D3 NESCAC — 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42408
Forward overall
#2076
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Forbort
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Spencer Barrow
Elmira · 2024-25
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ashton Delmonico
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.