IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Barrow Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 39 19 29 48 1.231 0.2163 0.2152 0.2820 0.2806
2023-24 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 28 22 29 51 1.821 0.3200 0.3021 0.4173 0.3939
2024-25 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 39 6 20 26 0.667 0.2197 0.2050 0.2268 0.2116
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 17 3 2 5 0.294
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2025-26 · Elmira
+40.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27401
Forward overall
#1587
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nate Foster
Nichols · 2016-17
0.188 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lane Paddison
Manhattanville · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Zanin
Rivier · 2024-25
0.150 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.