IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Barrow Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 39 19 29 48 1.231 0.1136 0.1130 0.2819 0.2805
2023-24 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 28 22 29 51 1.821 0.1681 0.1587 0.4171 0.3938
2024-25 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 39 6 20 26 0.667 0.0872 0.0814 0.2263 0.2111
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 17 3 2 5 0.294
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2025-26 · Elmira
+206.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27612
Forward overall
#1608
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nate Foster
Nichols · 2016-17
0.188 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Zanin
Rivier · 2024-25
0.150 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lane Paddison
Manhattanville · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.