IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lane Paddison Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Canmore Eagles AJHL 36 5 17 22 0.611 0.2050 0.2050 0.5655 0.5655
2020-21 Canmore Eagles AJHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1677 0.1677 0.4627 0.4627
2021-22 Canmore Eagles AJHL 33 5 11 16 0.485 0.1626 0.1509 0.4486 0.4164
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 18 2 6 8 0.444
2024-25 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 27 6 13 19 0.704
2023-24 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 21 8 8 16 0.762
2022-23 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 25 2 9 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2022-23 · Manhattanville
+240.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31988
Forward overall
#1703
Forward born in 2001
#1029
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Riley Christensen
St. Norbert · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jody Sullivan
SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Kostelecky
Bethel · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.