← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lane Paddison Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Canmore Eagles AJHL 36 5 17 22 0.611 0.2041 0.2041 0.5673 0.5673
2020-21 Canmore Eagles AJHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1670 0.1670 0.4642 0.4642
2021-22 Canmore Eagles AJHL 33 5 11 16 0.485 0.1619 0.1503 0.4500 0.4177
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 18 2 6 8 0.444
2024-25 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 27 6 13 19 0.704
2023-24 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 21 8 8 16 0.762
2022-23 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 25 2 9 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2022-23 · Manhattanville
+241.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23017
Forward overall
#842
Forward born in 2001
#1226
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2017-18
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.