IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Mourar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-08-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Richmond Generals USPHL-Elite 30 14 22 36 1.200 0.0894 0.0890 0.2749 0.2736
2018-19 Richmond Generals USPHL-Premier 44 15 35 50 1.136 0.1282 0.1274 0.3866 0.3841
2019-20 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 49 4 16 20 0.408 0.0885 0.0885 0.3160 0.3160
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Hobart D3 SUNYAC GR 31 9 12 21 0.677
2023-24 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 29 8 6 14 0.483
2022-23 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 31 4 12 16 0.516
2021-22 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 27 10 13 23 0.852
2020-21 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6445
Defenseman overall
#1430
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Murray
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Nevalainen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zeke Costello
Nichols · 2004-05
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaun Jameson
Wentworth · 2007-08
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Jacobs
Neumann · 2004-05
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.