IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mathias Branton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-08-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Minnesota Mullets USPHL-Elite 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.0372 0.0407 0.1145 0.1253
2018-19 Minnesota Outlaws USPHL-Premier 42 7 23 30 0.714 0.0806 0.0801 0.2430 0.2416
2019-20 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 40 1 19 20 0.500 0.0553 0.0553 0.1584 0.1584
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 11 1 0 1 0.091
2022-23 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 9 0 1 1 0.111
2021-22 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 17 0 3 3 0.176
2020-21 Hamline D1 — FR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
65%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9277
Defenseman overall
#1852
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Geric Brodt
Wentworth · 2005-06
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Collier
Bowdoin · 2010-11
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Ferraro
Saint Anselm · 2015-16
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.