IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared Newell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-10-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 — USPHL-Premier 41 8 8 16 0.390 0.0440 0.0464 0.1327 0.1401
2018-19 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 36 2 5 7 0.194 0.0219 0.0220 0.0661 0.0663
2019-20 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 32 4 5 9 0.281 0.0317 0.0317 0.0957 0.0957
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Suffolk D3 CNE — 23 0 4 4 0.174
2020-21 Becker D3 — FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
55%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18369
Defenseman overall
#2868
Defenseman born in 1999
#5091
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chandler Watson
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2015-16
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Barber
Castleton · 2016-17
0.120 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Varney
Hamilton · 2016-17
0.100 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.