← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Barber Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-10-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 43 5 18 23 0.535 0.0783 0.0806 0.2620 0.2697
2017-18 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 49 9 33 42 0.857 0.1255 0.1222 0.4198 0.4088
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 24 1 5 6 0.250
2020-21 Castleton D1 LittleEast JR 7 0 2 2 0.286
2020-21 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 7 0 2 2 0.286
2019-20 Castleton D1 LittleEast SO 26 1 5 6 0.231
2019-20 Castleton D3 LittleEast SO 26 1 5 6 0.231
2018-19 Castleton D1 LittleEast FR 25 3 0 3 0.120
2018-19 Castleton D3 LittleEast FR 25 3 0 3 0.120
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2018-19 · Castleton
+20.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4373
Defenseman overall
#940
Defenseman born in 1997
#467
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hamline · 2011-12
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2021-22
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2024-25
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.