IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chandler Watson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-11-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 — CCHL 59 5 15 20 0.339 0.0735 0.0767 0.2624 0.2739
2015-16 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.0434 0.0432 0.1548 0.1541
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Milwaukee School of Engineering D1 — SR 3 1 0 1 0.333
2020-21 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — SR 3 1 0 1 0.333
2019-20 Milwaukee School of Engineering D1 — JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Milwaukee School of Engineering D1 — SO 15 2 1 3 0.200
2018-19 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — SO 15 2 1 3 0.200
2017-18 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — FR 3 0 1 1 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2017-18 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+588.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#44821
Forward overall
#2027
Forward born in 1996
#1303
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Kaljian
Adrian · 2018-19
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Huggett
UMass Boston · 2005-06
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nathan Hinze
Beloit · 2023-24
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.