IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Rowe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-06-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Couchiching Terriers OJHL 40 9 10 19 0.475 0.1427 0.1353 0.3251 0.3082
2004-05 — OJHL 37 5 4 9 0.243 0.0731 0.0656 0.1665 0.1494
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Bethel D3 — — 0 107 955 1062 0.000
2014-15 Bethel D3 — — 0 85 686 771 0.000
2008-09 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast SR 24 2 1 3 0.125
2007-08 Southern Maine D3 HockeyEast JR 22 2 1 3 0.136
2006-07 Lebanon Valley D3 — SO 23 4 11 15 0.652
2005-06 Lebanon Valley D3 — FR 25 7 4 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2005-06 · Lebanon Valley
+450.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#46234
Forward overall
#1303
Forward born in 1984
#3909
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Moore
Lawrence · 2001-02
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
David Van Iterson
UMass Boston · 2024-25
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brayden Fryfogle
Canton · 2023-24
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.