IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Kubitz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-04-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.2300 0.2467 0.3168 0.3398
2019-20 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 41 1 21 22 0.537 0.1234 0.1234 0.1700 0.1700
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 26 2 6 8 0.308
2023-24 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 25 1 11 12 0.480
2022-23 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 23 1 6 7 0.304
2021-22 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 9 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Bethel D1 — FR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Bethel D3 MIAC — 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
92%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13659
Defenseman overall
#2353
Defenseman born in 2001
#2259
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Matt Murphy
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Northland (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Clifton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Luke Voltin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Downing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Michigan (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robbie Murden
Hamilton · 2009-10
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Arcan
SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Laganiere
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.