IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Durajlija Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-04-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 — OJHL 51 1 5 6 0.118 0.0288 0.0291 0.0810 0.0818
2018-19 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 40 3 5 8 0.200 0.0815 0.0801 0.1608 0.1580
2019-20 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 50 1 6 7 0.140 0.0571 0.0571 0.1125 0.1125
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC — 17 0 2 2 0.118
2023-24 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC — 10 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Albertus Magnus D1 UCHC FR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC — 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19450
Defenseman overall
#2971
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wade Harstad
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2002-03
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alec MacKenzie
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Zachary Smith
Southern New Hampshire · 2021-22
0.238 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.