← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shawn Montgomery Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-04-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 USPHL-Premier-Classic 35 4 8 12 0.343 0.0963 0.0965 0.2820 0.2827
2017-18 Northeast Generals NAHL 39 1 4 5 0.128 0.0455 0.0424 0.1352 0.1260
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Suffolk D3 CNE SR 24 9 8 17 0.708
2020-21 Suffolk D1 CNE JR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Suffolk D3 CNE JR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Suffolk D1 CNE SO 25 4 8 12 0.480
2019-20 Suffolk D3 CNE SO 25 4 8 12 0.480
2018-19 Suffolk D1 CNE FR 24 3 8 11 0.458
2018-19 Suffolk D3 CNE FR 24 3 8 11 0.458
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2018-19 · Suffolk
+657.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22315
Defenseman overall
#2784
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2014-15
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2023-24
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2004-05
0.148 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.