IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alec Hamady Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 48 8 8 16 0.333 0.0723 0.0735 0.2580 0.2622
2022-23 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 52 10 10 20 0.385 0.0834 0.0810 0.2977 0.2892
2023-24 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 43 12 21 33 0.767 0.1664 0.1528 0.5940 0.5455
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 27 7 2 9 0.333
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 12 2 0 2 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2024-25 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+57.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32243
Forward overall
#1934
Forward born in 2003
#739
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kelby Lorenz
Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kris Boyce
St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Muzyka
Skidmore · 2016-17
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.