← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bradley McMains Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 L/A Nordiques NA3HL 47 12 24 36 0.766 0.1762 0.1762 0.2427 0.2427
2020-21 Thunder Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 26 11 12 23 0.885 0.2916 0.2916 0.3009 0.3009
2021-22 Thunder Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 10 3 5 8 0.800 0.2637 0.2715 0.2722 0.2803
2022-23 Seacoast Spartans EHL 43 9 6 15 0.349 0.1227 0.1239 0.1710 0.1726
2023-24 EHL 44 14 14 28 0.636 0.2239 0.2147 0.3120 0.2992
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Post D2 NE10 19 4 3 7 0.368
2024-25 Post D2 NE10 15 2 1 3 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2024-25 · Post
+31.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28060
Forward overall
#1607
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.