IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Rosen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-04-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 — NAHL 43 1 4 5 0.116 0.0461 0.0476 0.1221 0.1261
2013-14 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 49 6 7 13 0.265 0.0675 0.0658 0.1101 0.1073
2014-15 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 51 6 21 27 0.529 0.1346 0.1233 0.2196 0.2012
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Canton D3 — JR 23 1 1 2 0.087
2016-17 Canton D3 — SO 15 0 2 2 0.133
2015-16 Canton D3 — FR 25 2 4 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2015-16 · Canton
+153.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18170
Defenseman overall
#1982
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Blaine Caton
Marian · 2017-18
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Condon
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Teagan Waugh
Manhattanville · 2012-13
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.