IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tom Sköld Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-07-19 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 21 0 7 7 0.333 0.0770 0.0816 0.1631 0.1729
2018-19 — EHL 33 0 11 11 0.333 0.0770 0.0778 0.1631 0.1647
2019-20 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 45 1 27 28 0.622 0.1437 0.1437 0.3044 0.3044
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Westfield State D3 MASCAC — 19 1 1 2 0.105
2021-22 Westfield State D3 MASCAC — 25 3 6 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2021-22 · Westfield State
+380.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
45%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9663
Defenseman overall
#1882
Defenseman born in 1999
#1233
in EHL

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Beaudette
Wisconsin-Stout · 2007-08
0.346 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Craig McDowell
Lake Forest · 2008-09
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Charles Barber
Buffalo State · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.