IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Beaudette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-07-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Omaha Lancers USHL 13 1 2 3 0.231 0.1361 0.1386 0.6932 0.7062
2007-08 Indiana Ice USHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2008-09 Owatonna Express NAHL 53 7 10 17 0.321 0.1179 0.1105 0.3386 0.3175
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SR 25 4 13 17 0.680
2011-12 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC JR 27 5 2 7 0.259
2010-11 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SO 14 1 2 3 0.214
2009-10 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC FR 26 4 5 9 0.346
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2009-10 · Wisconsin-Stout
+201.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10664
Defenseman overall
#1235
Defenseman born in 1988

D1 Comparables

Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stephen Beck
Western New England · 2014-15
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryan Whelan
Framingham State · 2017-18
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitchell Snider
Manhattanville · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.