← New Search ↗ Social Card

Toivo Kramer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-09-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier 44 7 7 14 0.318 0.0359 0.0377 0.1083 0.1136
2019-20 New York Apple Core EHL 42 14 35 49 1.167 0.1707 0.1707 0.5720 0.5720
2020-21 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 21 8 10 18 0.857 0.1254 0.1254 0.4202 0.4202
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SR 23 4 4 8 0.348
2023-24 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC JR 27 6 14 20 0.741
2022-23 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SO 25 5 8 13 0.520
2021-22 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC FR 22 7 8 15 0.682
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2021-22 · Fitchburg State
+2010.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
95%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19278
Forward overall
#856
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stonehill · 2014-15
0.227 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2009-10
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.