← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Mitchell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 44 12 22 34 0.773 0.1011 0.1081 0.2623 0.2804
2019-20 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 44 20 37 57 1.296 0.1695 0.1695 0.4397 0.4397
2020-21 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 44 17 42 59 1.341 0.1754 0.1754 0.4551 0.4551
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Chatham D3 UCHC SR 27 2 5 7 0.259
2023-24 Chatham D3 UCHC JR 26 2 4 6 0.231
2022-23 Chatham D3 UCHC SO 24 5 6 11 0.458
2021-22 Chatham D3 UCHC FR 22 7 5 12 0.545
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2021-22 · Chatham
+489.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
95%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9516
Forward overall
#416
Forward born in 2001
#409
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ RPI (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ UMass (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2004-05
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2018-19
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.