IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Coyle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-02-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Cleveland Barons NAHL 23 8 4 12 0.522 0.2067 0.2198 0.5477 0.5825
2005-06 Mahoning Valley Phantoms NAHL 10 4 0 4 0.400 0.1585 0.1607 0.4200 0.4258
2007-08 Ohio Blue Jackets USHL 7 1 2 3 0.429 0.2635 0.2360 1.2627 1.1310
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Utica D3 — FR 24 7 6 13 0.542
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2008-09 · Utica
+207.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31676
Forward overall
#1002
Forward born in 1987

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Carlson
Wilkes · 2021-22
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Depp
Elmira · 2011-12
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
John Moncovich
Utica · 2018-19
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.