← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrett Allen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-03-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Fargo Force USHL 60 24 18 42 0.700 0.4129 0.4295 2.1024 2.1869
2010-11 USHL 39 8 4 12 0.308 0.1815 0.1796 0.9241 0.9146
2011-12 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 54 5 19 24 0.444 0.2622 0.2473 1.3347 1.2587
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SR 26 6 2 8 0.308
2014-15 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast JR 27 2 6 8 0.296
2013-14 Denver D1 NCHC 18 0 1 1 0.056
2013-14 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SO 25 2 4 6 0.240
2012-13 Denver D1 WCHA-orig 28 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#17820
Forward overall
#679
Forward born in 1992
#1736
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Franklin Pierce · 2017-18
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2021-22
1.476 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.