IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Artjoms Koppass Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-23 Country: Latvia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 — NCDC 27 6 13 19 0.704 0.2869 0.3130 0.5656 0.6171
2018-19 Boston Jr. Bandits NCDC 40 12 11 23 0.575 0.2344 0.2424 0.4622 0.4779
2019-20 Boston Jr. Bandits NCDC 50 13 28 41 0.820 0.3343 0.3343 0.6591 0.6591
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Curry D3 CNE SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Curry D3 CNE JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Curry D3 CNE SO 10 1 4 5 0.500
2021-22 Curry D3 CNE FR 12 1 2 3 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2021-22 · Curry
+7.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
65%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7726
Forward overall
#329
Forward born in 2000
#178
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Tyler Pham
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Christian Lampasso
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Coatta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy DeVito
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Peter Unger
Keene State · 2021-22
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Gaulin
Endicott · 2019-20
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Talan Plante
Concordia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.