IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Artjoms Koppass Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-23 Country: Latvia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 — NCDC 27 6 13 19 0.704 0.3924 0.4281 0.5690 0.6208
2018-19 Boston Jr. Bandits NCDC 40 12 11 23 0.575 0.3206 0.3315 0.4649 0.4807
2019-20 Boston Jr. Bandits NCDC 50 13 28 41 0.820 0.4572 0.4572 0.6631 0.6631
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Curry D3 CNE SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Curry D3 CNE JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Curry D3 CNE SO 10 1 4 5 0.500
2021-22 Curry D3 CNE FR 12 1 2 3 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2021-22 · Curry
-21.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
68%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8840
Forward overall
#361
Forward born in 2000
#189
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Max Coatta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jack Rowe
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Arizona State (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brian Morgan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Maine (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
Christian Lampasso
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Schmidt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Bentley (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Danny Cavanagh
Babson · 2019-20
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Craig Kitto
Williams · 2008-09
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Bartfield
Skidmore · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.