| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Philadelphia Little Flyers | EHLP | 43 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 0.326 | 0.0212 | 0.0227 | 0.0733 | 0.0784 |
| 2018-19 | Philadelphia Little Flyers | EHL | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.125 | 0.0183 | 0.0197 | 0.0613 | 0.0660 |
| 2019-20 | Philadelphia Little Flyers | EHL | 44 | 6 | 20 | 26 | 0.591 | 0.0864 | 0.0864 | 0.2897 | 0.2897 |
| 2020-21 | Philadelphia Little Flyers | EHL | 38 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 0.316 | 0.0462 | 0.0462 | 0.1548 | 0.1548 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Rivier | D3 | MASCAC | SR | 14 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.071 |
| 2023-24 | Rivier | D3 | MASCAC | JR | 18 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.278 |
| 2022-23 | Rivier | D3 | MASCAC | SO | 12 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.083 |
| 2021-22 | Rivier | D3 | MASCAC | FR | 12 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.083 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.