← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Turner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-11-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHLP 43 5 9 14 0.326 0.0212 0.0227 0.0733 0.0784
2018-19 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 8 1 0 1 0.125 0.0183 0.0197 0.0613 0.0660
2019-20 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 44 6 20 26 0.591 0.0864 0.0864 0.2897 0.2897
2020-21 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 38 4 8 12 0.316 0.0462 0.0462 0.1548 0.1548
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Rivier D3 MASCAC SR 14 1 0 1 0.071
2023-24 Rivier D3 MASCAC JR 18 0 5 5 0.278
2022-23 Rivier D3 MASCAC SO 12 0 1 1 0.083
2021-22 Rivier D3 MASCAC FR 12 0 1 1 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2021-22 · Rivier
+322.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
95%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9710
Defenseman overall
#1821
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2017-18
0.346 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Finlandia · 2012-13
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.