IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Madzey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-04-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 39 2 3 5 0.128 0.0188 0.0197 0.0629 0.0658
2019-20 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NA3HL 47 7 26 33 0.702 0.0777 0.0777 0.2224 0.2224
2020-21 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NA3HL 36 9 19 28 0.778 0.0860 0.0860 0.2464 0.2464
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 — 30 0 4 4 0.133
2024-25 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 — 29 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 — 7 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 New England College D3 LittleEast — 8 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 New England College D3 LittleEast — 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
88%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11328
Defenseman overall
#2035
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Dylan Maller
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Boje
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Buchanan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Wade
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dane Cooper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Virgoe
SUNY Cortland · 2007-08
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Nelson
Bethel · 2016-17
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Gabriel Flood
Canton · 2014-15
0.118 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.