IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mark Sullivan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-07-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 43 12 16 28 0.651 0.1819 0.1846 0.4494 0.4560
2006-07 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 47 12 28 40 0.851 0.2378 0.2294 0.5873 0.5665
2007-08 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 42 24 32 56 1.333 0.3725 0.3424 0.9201 0.8459
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 SUNY Potsdam D3 — FR 15 1 3 4 0.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2008-09 · SUNY Potsdam
+4.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11521
Forward overall
#487
Forward born in 1987
#574
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Peter Bates
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyson Gilmour
SUNY Geneseo · 2018-19
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Owen Sikich
Saint Mary's · 2017-18
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.