← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Dapprich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-02-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 9 2 4 6 0.667 0.0752 0.0752 0.2268 0.2268
2021-22 Boston Advantage NCDC 36 0 8 8 0.222 0.0514 0.0477 0.1797 0.1669
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Castleton D3 LittleEast 26 6 13 19 0.731
2024-25 Castleton D3 LittleEast 25 2 5 7 0.280
2023-24 Castleton D3 LittleEast 20 0 3 3 0.150
2022-23 Rivier D3 MASCAC 25 2 8 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2022-23 · Rivier
+788.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13568
Defenseman overall
#2344
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2013-14
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2022-23
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.