← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Cardow Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-02-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 17 2 3 5 0.294 0.0680 0.0680 0.2378 0.2378
2021-22 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 40 1 5 6 0.150 0.0347 0.0322 0.1213 0.1126
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Rivier D3 MASCAC SR 8 0 1 1 0.125
2024-25 Rivier D3 MASCAC 19 1 3 4 0.210
2023-24 Post D2 NE10 26 3 9 12 0.462
2022-23 Post D2 NE10 29 4 5 9 0.310
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2022-23 · Post
+920.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14536
Defenseman overall
#2466
Defenseman born in 2001
#1421
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nazareth · 2024-25
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2024-25
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2021-22
0.210 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.