IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Devine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 41 16 35 51 1.244 0.2669 0.2727 0.6091 0.6224
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SO 2 0 1 1 0.500
2022-23 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 FR 11 1 3 4 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2022-23 · Saint Anselm
+55.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
10%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13073
Forward overall
#442
Forward born in 2002
#53
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Sieckhaus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Bentley (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joey Martini
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Malcolm Arseneau
Fredonia · 2017-18
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Deiter Stange
Worcester State · 2018-19
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.