IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Giancarlo Iuorio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-02-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Markham Waxers OJHL 35 12 11 23 0.657 0.1974 0.2056 0.4498 0.4685
2007-08 Markham Waxers OJHL 27 11 16 27 1.000 0.3004 0.2993 0.6845 0.6819
2008-09 Markham Waxers OJHL 42 28 41 69 1.643 0.4935 0.4663 1.1246 1.0627
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Niagara D1 AHA SR 27 21 13 34 1.259
2011-12 Niagara D1 AHA JR 31 10 14 24 0.774
2010-11 Niagara D1 AHA SO 31 9 24 33 1.065
2009-10 Niagara D1 AHA FR 26 5 6 11 0.423
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2009-10 · Niagara
+23.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10726
Forward overall
#381
Forward born in 1989
#257
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Chad McDonald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Michael Vecchione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Conor Brown
Amherst · 2011-12
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Bradshaw
St. Norbert · 2009-10
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Skylur Jameson
Wentworth · 2006-07
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.