← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vincent Velocci Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 42 10 15 25 0.595 0.1291 0.1291 0.4607 0.4607
2020-21 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 49 16 16 32 0.653 0.1417 0.1364 0.5056 0.4866
2022-23 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 52 16 43 59 1.135 0.2461 0.2258 0.8783 0.8059
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Amherst D3 NESCAC GR 24 4 7 11 0.458
2024-25 Amherst D3 NESCAC SR 18 3 6 9 0.500
2023-24 Amherst D3 NESCAC JR 24 5 9 14 0.583
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2023-24 · Amherst
+258.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18299
Forward overall
#983
Forward born in 2002
#303
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2015-16
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.