IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jed Brazo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Canterbury NE-Prep 24 25 17 42 1.750 0.3376 0.3376 0.8008 0.8008
2022-23 Canterbury NE-Prep 29 27 29 56 1.931 0.3725 0.3725 0.8836 0.8836
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 29 5 7 12 0.414
2024-25 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 21 1 3 4 0.191
2023-24 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 24 4 6 10 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2023-24 · Norwich
+35.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
32%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5008
Forward overall
#148
Forward born in 2003
#4
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Luke Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Rose
Elmira · 2000-01
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyson Gilmour
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Stewart
Marian · 2011-12
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.