← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Marchant Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 35 3 14 17 0.486 0.1122 0.1122 0.2377 0.2377
2021-22 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 46 2 9 11 0.239 0.0552 0.0562 0.1170 0.1190
2022-23 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 42 6 8 14 0.333 0.0770 0.0743 0.1631 0.1574
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 GR 23 1 3 4 0.174
2024-25 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SR 28 4 6 10 0.357
2023-24 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 JR 30 4 3 7 0.233
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2023-24 · Southern New Hampshire
+306.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43130
Forward overall
#2712
Forward born in 2002
#1816
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2014-15
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2024-25
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.