← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Craig Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-04-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier 37 2 6 8 0.216 0.0244 0.0244 0.0736 0.0736
2021-22 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier 42 2 5 7 0.167 0.0188 0.0184 0.0567 0.0555
2022-23 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier 43 3 21 24 0.558 0.0630 0.0586 0.1899 0.1767
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Framingham State D3 MASCAC 20 2 5 7 0.350
2024-25 Framingham State D3 MASCAC 18 1 2 3 0.167
2023-24 Post D2 NE10 26 2 5 7 0.269
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2023-24 · Post
+571.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14456
Defenseman overall
#2705
Defenseman born in 2002
#4168
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Williams · 2008-09
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2015-16
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.