IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott McManus Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Seahawks Hockey EHL 10 0 2 2 0.200 0.0293 0.0293 0.0980 0.0980
2021-22 Seahawks Hockey EHL 43 19 12 31 0.721 0.1055 0.1059 0.3531 0.3544
2022-23 Seahawks Hockey EHL 46 18 32 50 1.087 0.1591 0.1514 0.5324 0.5068
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Suffolk D3 CNE GR 26 6 7 13 0.500
2024-25 Suffolk D3 CNE SR 27 6 8 14 0.518
2023-24 Suffolk D3 CNE JR 19 5 1 6 0.316
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2023-24 · Suffolk
+177.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18933
Forward overall
#1010
Forward born in 2002
#387
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Caleb Labrie
Becker · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Reinholz
Hamline · 2013-14
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Perichak
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.