← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wesley Crofoot Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Premier 42 8 6 14 0.333 0.0436 0.0436 0.1131 0.1131
2021-22 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Premier 38 7 3 10 0.263 0.0344 0.0332 0.0893 0.0863
2022-23 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Premier 40 15 16 31 0.775 0.1014 0.0930 0.2630 0.2412
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arcadia D3 MAC GR 22 1 3 4 0.182
2024-25 Arcadia D3 MAC SR 14 1 5 6 0.429
2023-24 Arcadia D3 MAC JR 17 3 3 6 0.353
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2023-24 · Arcadia
+497.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33609
Forward overall
#1999
Forward born in 2002
#2779
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alvernia · 2024-25
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2004-05
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.