← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Saurbaugh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-07-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Bay State Bobcats NA3HL 29 6 6 12 0.414 0.0519 0.0519 0.1306 0.1306
2020-21 Elmira Impact USPHL-Premier 35 8 6 14 0.400 0.0523 0.0523 0.1358 0.1358
2021-22 Palm Beach Typhoon USPHL-Premier 41 17 18 35 0.854 0.1117 0.1165 0.2897 0.3021
2022-23 Express Hockey Club EHL 37 16 13 29 0.784 0.1811 0.1852 0.3835 0.3921
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC JR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SO 18 2 2 4 0.222
2023-24 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 12 3 2 5 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2023-24 · SUNY Brockport
+208.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
20%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22235
Forward overall
#1187
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2010-11
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2007-08
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2010-11
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.