IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Hughes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-07-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 51 12 18 30 0.588 0.2184 0.2178 0.6228 0.6212
2011-12 — NAHL 54 13 10 23 0.426 0.1581 0.1499 0.4509 0.4275
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Concordia D3 MIAC GR 18 9 6 15 0.833
2014-15 Concordia Wisconsin D3 — JR 18 9 6 15 0.833
2013-14 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 27 11 12 23 0.852
2013-14 Concordia Wisconsin D3 — SO 27 11 12 23 0.852
2012-13 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 18 6 6 12 0.667
2012-13 Concordia Wisconsin D3 — FR 18 6 6 12 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2012-13 · Concordia
+339.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22487
Forward overall
#875
Forward born in 1991
#2312
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Johnny Panvica
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Polsinelli
Trinity · 2016-17
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Neduzak
Wisconsin-Superior · 2012-13
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.